Designed (but never built) large-format CoreXY 3D printer optimized for printing PANDORA robot structural components at high speed. The design prioritized precision and rigidity through machined components rather than 3D-printed parts—pushing performance boundaries at the expense of cost.
Target Specifications:
Build volume: 12" x 18" x 24"
CoreXY motion system
High-speed capability (150mm/s+)
Dual extrusion
Fully enclosed heated chamber
Primary Goal: Print large structural robot parts in optimal orientations while maintaining:
Dimensional accuracy for robotic assembly fit
Surface finish quality for minimal post-processing
Speed to enable rapid design iteration
Key Challenge: Standard hobby printers either lacked build volume or couldn't maintain accuracy at necessary speeds for structural components.
Structural Design Philosophy:
Departed from typical maker approach of 3D-printed frame components. Instead, specified machined aluminum and waterjet-cut steel plates to achieve:
Minimal flex under high acceleration
Tight tolerance assembly
Long-term dimensional stability
Professional-grade performance
Motion System:
Precision linear rails (low friction, high load capacity)
Ball screws on Z-axis (vs lead screws) for accuracy
High-quality stepper motors selected for torque/speed
Belt tensioning system for CoreXY kinematics
Thermal Management:
Fully heated build chamber (printing engineering plastics)
Heated filament path (moisture management)
Isolated electronics enclosure (thermal protection)
High-power heated bed (large thermal mass)
Advanced Features:
Dual Bowden extruders (multi-material/support)
Filament pre-heater (improve layer adhesion)
Separate electronics bay (extend component life)
Enclosed design (temperature stability)
Final Cost Estimate: ~$5,000
The Math:
Machined frame components: $1,200
Linear motion (rails, screws, bearings): $800
Electronics and motors: $600
Heated chamber system: $500
Dual extruder setup: $400
Miscellaneous (belts, fasteners, etc.): $500
Assembly time: 40+ hours
The Reality Check:
For $5,000, I could:
Buy two high-quality 3D printers
Outsource large prints to companies if needed.
Purchase multiple Ender-3/Ender-5/CR-10 and adjust part orientation
The performance gain vs cost didn't justify building.
Decision: File away design, move forward with larger budget friendly printing.
Lessons Learned
1. Commercial vs Custom Trade-offs
Custom builds make sense when:
Commercial options don't exist
Unique requirements justify cost
Learning is the primary goal
Budget isn't constrained
They don't make sense when:
Commercial options are "good enough"
Custom costs 3-5x more
Time is limited
The tool isn't the end goal
2. Opportunity Cost
$5,000 and 40 hours building a printer meant:
Less money for robot actuators, sensors, controls
Less time on actual research
Lower priority work taking resources from higher priority work
Sometimes the best engineering decision is not building something.
Value of Concept Work
While never built, this design exercise provided:
Deep understanding of CoreXY kinematics in 3D printing systems
Experience with precision motion system design
Cost estimation and BOM development practice
Insight into commercial printer trade-offs
Material for teaching DFM principles (what NOT to do)
Current Approach
Instead of building the Mega CoreXY Printer:
Bought Ender - 3, Ender - 5, and CR-10 Creality 3D-Printers
Designed PANDORA parts to fit within available build volumes
Accepted slower print speeds with multi-day builds
Focused budget on robot components, not tooling
Result: PANDORA parts were completed successfully without $5,000 printer investment.