Custom-designed Core XY 3D printer prioritizing cost-effectiveness through using additive-manufactured versus subtractive-manufactured parts. The goal: build a high-performance printer for $1,500 using 3D-printed structural components instead of machined aluminum, while maintaining precision and speed capabilities.
Key Specifications:
Build volume: 24" x 16" x 24"
Dual Bowden extruders
Auto bed leveling (BLTouch)
BigTreeTech controller with Touchscreen
NEMA 23 motors (X, Y, Z axes)
Challenge: The Previous Prusa Titan build suffered from a heavy moving bed, causing quality issues and speed limitations.
Solution: Implemented a modern CoreXY motion system where:
Bed moves only vertically (Z-axis)
Gantry controls X-Y motion
Lightweight print head design via remote motor mounting
Key Design Decision: Initially planned a single Y-axis motor but switched to a belt-synchronized dual rail system to prevent misalignment at high speeds—maintaining single-motor simplicity while ensuring balanced movement.
Applied design principles from humanoid robot development to create structurally optimized 3D-printed components:
Extruder Block:
Integrated dual print head mounts
Internal cable routing channels
Bearing housings for smooth linear motion
BLTouch sensor mount
Material cost: ~$5 vs $200+ for machined equivalent
Corner Brackets:
Single-piece construction housing X and Y linear rods
Integrated bearing mounts
Optimized infill patterns for high-stress areas
Design informed by robotics research on 3D-printed structural components
Total AM parts cost: ~$40 in filament vs $1,000+ for machined components
Design Process:
Complete CAD model in Siemens NX before purchasing hardware
Motion simulation and clearance checking
Iterative refinement based on research and community builds
Bill of materials optimization for budget constraints
Assembly Insights:
Mechanical assembly: 2 days (accelerated by detailed CAD pre-planning)
Electrical integration: In progress when discontinued
Main challenge: Z-axis ball screw alignment (solved through careful leveling)
What Worked:
Thorough CAD modeling prevented costly mistakes
AM structural components performed well while reducing costs 80%
Belt-synchronized Y-axis solved single-motor limitations
Remote motor mounting significantly reduced moving mass
What Didn't Work:
Using 4 linear rods for the z-axis in each corner
Trying to keep the electronics separate from the printer
Using 45 x 45 mm extruded aluminum
Project Outcome: Discontinued to focus on PhD research. The existing Ender 3 provided sufficient capability for personal needs while I completed my research.